Honestly I’ll never get over how gross Yaniv targeting Sikh women was. It was even worse than what Peterson was trying to warn us about.
“Under this bill a weirdo could compel you to pretend he’s some made up gender” was already being dismissed as not being q legit complaint.
Imagine if he had said “under this bill a sex predator could force his way into a woman’s home and compel her to undress him and touch his genitals, and she would have to pretend to be fine with this”. He would have been mocked for his absurd hypothetical, and yet that is exactly what happened.
cc @crunklord420 wondering if you follow the guy more closely and can provide some insight. Why the fuck did Peterson not acknowledge the Yaniv situation and point to that as an “I told you so”?
