There used to be this really silly pride in high uptime metrics on servers. Those days are so fucking gone.
"EXCUSE ME MADAM PROFESSOR I KNOW YOU'RE ON. A DEADLINE BUT YOUR SERVER UPTIME IS CAUSING ME TO NOT GET MY #NUMBERS"
If you enjoy a bit of Shakespeare, do check out his version of Coriolanus, with Gerard Butler failing to be Gerard Butler (in the good way).
Today in 1999, 24 years ago: the football club Deportes Copiapó is founded in Chile.
Hello world! Elon Musk picking a twitter fight with Icelandic philanthropist and man of the year 2022 Haraldur Thorleifsson ended up being the final push that we needed, so now we are here on Mastodon. We don't know how any of this works, but follow us for posts on vision science, cognitive psychology, cognitive science, cognitive neuroscience, and stupid memes.
Panic is a model macOS software company, the kind of thing Apple should be bending over backwards to attract to the platform. Untitled Goose Game is an incredibly good game that is a perfect fit for the Mac.
That Panic could not get Untitled Goose Game through App Review without getting jerked around over inane reasons is a damning indictment of the entire idea that App Review is a gatekeeper for quality, rather than a means of ideological control.
And although you get five years security support for Ubuntu LTS, on a prod server that goes by surprisingly quick. After that if you want to stay secure you're talking a full upgrade (not always possible on a prod server) or paying for ESM via Ubuntu Pro.
And a really good little feature of Rocky is they include security metadata for update --security which CentOS does not. This makes crucial updates a breeze.
Today in 1827, 196 years ago: on the hill of Caballada, in the extreme south of the province of Buenos Aires (Argentina) the forces of the Empire of Brazil ―commanded by Captain James Shepherd― face the garrison of Fort del Carmen ―commanded by Colonel Martín Lacarra―, in what was called the Battle of Carmen de Patagones.
There is a vast difference between someone not understanding a problem and them making no effort to understand that problem. That they *should* know something in the estimation of others has no relevance as to whether they do know it.
This isn't a barracks, you don't need to yell at people or humiliate them to get them to understand, there's no need for it.
The height of this attitude is best portrayed by ESR's essay here:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
There's a *lot* of attitude in there. It's easy to see how someone can be seduced by it because it depicts a position of superiority, but this is little to do with solving problems.
I have personally encountered it on the Arch forums, and the FreeBSD forums. Hostility to users asking legitimate questions on the assumption they've not put any leg work in - whether they have or not. Treating everyone like shit == treating everyone the same is no way to run things.
I see both ends of this. One of my work responsibilities is managing the level 1 Helpdesk people and I get their frustrations, but you can't let a few less motivated users set the tone for how you treat people, because this leads to. bad attitudes.
FOSS, motorbikes, and photography.